Daniel Weber: April 9, 2012 – Obamacare & Seniors

Why Is The President So Irked By The Supreme Court Review of Obamacare?

By Daniel Weber

“If there was ever a president that needed to be checked and balanced, it is Barack Obama. He’s the poster child for what the Founding Fathers had in mind when they provided for three equal branches of government—the Chief Executive, the Legislature and the Supreme Court,” said DAN WEBER, president of the Association of Mature American Citizens (AMAC).

The president, said Weber, has consistently criticized the Supreme Court throughout his first term, but his remarks after the hearing on his healthcare law is “at best an escalation of his rhetoric, and at worst a declaration of war on a judiciary determined to uphold the constitution.”

The pundits characterized the president’s reaction as having declared war on the judiciary and, while Weber said he doesn’t disagree with that assessment, he said he believes Mr. Obama is actually “at war with the Constitution, itself.”

The AMAC chief said that “the president would love to find a way to parse the Constitution in ways that support his ideological agenda and that’s why he’s so irked by the Supreme Court. Rather than use his knowledge as a Constitutional Scholar to uphold the basic tenets established by our Founding Fathers, he seems hell bent on discovering loopholes that might be used to further his socialist aims.

Obama challenged the nine justices of the Court as they go about their business. He said; “I’m confident that the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected Congress.”

It should be noted that the “strong majority” to which the president referred consisted entirely of his Democratic minions who held majorities in the House and Senate at the time, noted Weber. “There was not a single Republican who voted for Obamacare. So much for bi-partisanship!”

Speak Your Mind

*